Are autistic suspects likely to be disadvantaged in forensic interviews?
A new study led by Flinders University finds both autistic and nonautistic suspects may be judged more harshly if any idiosyncratic behaviors in interviews stray beyond what observers consider normal. The research also undermines the widely held perspective—referred to as the "double empathy hypothesis"—that autistic people can better "read" differing intentions and motivations in other autistic…
Read original article on Phys.org - latest science and technology news stories →Related news
-
Life-threatening Hurricane Isaias makes landfall in Florida
-
Mountaineer: 'Tenzing biopic made me wonder what he would think if he could return to the mountain today'
-
Geologists uncover evidence of a missing Late Cretaceous magmatic arc in northwestern Iran
-
Food testing reveals how diet can add to exposure to 'forever chemicals'
-
Big Controversy Upends a Contest About Microscopic Videos
-
Three quantum-inspired cores leave opposite fingerprints on the ringing of black holes
-
/https://tf-cmsv2-smithsonianmag-media.s3.amazonaws.com/filer_public/0e/75/0e759221-7bae-4759-ae5c-ea84bbb4b9d5/screenshot_2026-10-09_at_33437pm.png)
Watch Five Adorable Newborn Cheetah Cubs Grow on a Livestream From the Smithsonian's Conservation Biology Institute
-
Major earthquake strikes Panama—damage and injuries are expected